NOT AT ALL: The exact time when a state may abridge the rights of a fit parent, without a narrowly tailored compelling interest

SKU 198 Category:
Share Now On:

NOT AT ALL: The exact time when a state may abridge the rights of a fit parent, without a narrowly tailored compelling interest

SKU 198 Category:

This is a book of extensive legal research, based on a true story, unearthing just how afoul of integrity our federal government has run. It is a step by step explanation of how the Washington and the U.S. Supreme courts deliberately and strategically averted the appellate procedure, so that states could keep grandparents’ “rights” statutes on their lawbooks, which deprive fit parents of due process. It gives a full synopsis of the plight Kyung Trotter suffered at the receiving end of a process set up to for fit parents against grandparents to fail. It describes the impenetrable wall of judicial cohesion she went up against in Georgia, which exists to protect this state’s unconstitutional grandparents’ “rights” statute O.C.G.A. § 19-7-1(b.1) and its scheme for sale to grandparents, so that they may meet the statute’s so-called burden of proof, by way of The Uniform Superior Court Rule 24.9.4. This wall included countless unethical events such as the Georgia Attorney General representing the judge who took Ms. Trotter’s child, although he was sued in his individual capacity, a magistrate a federal judge and federal justices either usurping their authorities or refusing to exercise their authorities at all, in order to evade everything Ms. Trotter filed and asserted and a multitude of other inconceivable tactics by the lawyers involved such as the firm that the judge used to work for, representing the grandparents at all levels of adjudication, even though they were defendants in Ms. Trotters 42 U.S.C. § 1983 themselves- inter much alia.

Additional information

book-author

Kyung Lee Trotter

book-author

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “NOT AT ALL: The exact time when a state may abridge the rights of a fit parent, without a narrowly tailored compelling interest”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ABOUT AUTHOR

Learn About The Book Writer

NOT AT ALL: The exact time when a state may abridge the rights of a fit parent, without a narrowly tailored compelling interest

Kyung Lee Trotter

Kyung Trotter challenged the constitutionality of the Georgia statute, O.C.G.A. § 19-7-1.1) on the state and federal levels to no avail. She was met with an iron-clad wall of cohesive resistance in the form of every judge who presided over her cases, simply refuses to adjudicate anything, by deploying unspeakably unethical ways to avert procedure. Kyung Trotter challenged the constitutionality of the Georgia statute, O.C.G.A. § 19-7-1.1) on the state and federal levels to no avail. She was met with an iron-clad wall of cohesive resistance in the form of every judge who presided over her cases, simply refuses to adjudicate anything, by deploying unspeakably unethical ways to avert procedure.

Related products

BookFuel Search